JIMBOY Essays - Provinces Of The Philippines, Isabela,

JIMBOY JACINTO Ambatali, Ramon Isabela 09676220251 OBJECTIVES To enhance my skills and my abilities To develop the industry-desired values of positive work attitude, good human relations and competency in my field of specialization. ____________________________________________________ PERSONAL INFORMATION Age: 24 Birth D ate: July 01, 2002 Birth P lace: Ambatali, Ramon Isabela Citizenship: Filipino Religion: Roman Catholic Father's Name: Orlando Jacinto Mother's Name: Nanneth Jacinto ___________________________________________________ _ EDUCATION Tertiary Ifugao State University Potia Main Campus Secondary Ramon National High School Oscariz, Ramon, Isabela Primary Ambatli Elementary School Ambatali , Ramon Isabela ____________________________________________________ AREA OF EXPERIENCE On the job @ Ambatli Elementary School ____________________________________________________ SKILLS AND INTEREST Good relation to human skills Willing to work under pressure Willing to be trained to further enhance my skills for the improvement of my performance. Flexible, hardworking and independent. PERSONAL QUALITIES Honest Responsible Trustworthy Loyal Self-motivated Helpful CHARACTER REFERENCES Mrs. Thelma P. Ambatali Ambatali, Ramon, Isabela Principal III Mrs. Franielyn D. Miguel Burgos, Ramon, Isabela Teacher I I hereby attest that the above information is true and correct. Applicant JIMBOY JACINTO JIMBOY JACINTO Ambatali, Ramon Isabela 09676220251 Billy Jay Valleros Teacher II Ramon National High School Sir: Greetings of Peace and Love! It is a great pleasure that I am looking for a teaching position within your school. I believe that my instructional abilities, combined with my strong interpersonal skills and work ethics would greatly benefit your educational program. I am, JIMBOY JACINTO, 24 years of age, residence of Ambatali, Ramon Isabela with the degree of Bachelor of Elementary Education, at I fugao State University. I would like to apply as a Primary teacher in your school. I believe that education is the key to success for young students. I am a licensed teacher and at present I continuously enhance and seek professional growth and development by enrolling Masteral Degree of Education. I believed that this accomplishment will enable me to teach and motivate students ascertaining their inner strength and abilities and discovering what truly inspires them. I aim to provide a stimulating learning environment that encourages students to trust their own opinions and fostering confidence to others for my students to realize their full potential. Thank you and more power! Very truly yours, JIMBOY JACINTO Applicant

Atomic Bomb essays

Atomic Bomb essays Herbert Feis served as the Special Consultant to three Secretaries of War. This book was his finale to a series on the governmental viewed history of World War II, one of these receiving the Pulitzer Prize. Mr. Feis gives personal accounts in a strictly factual description leaving out no information that the president and high officials discussed within the walls of the White House. The information that is presented is referenced countlessly throughout the book. His position in the government gave him the ability to have direct knowledge from personal individuals, in the government at that time, who had assessed the actions first hand. With these contacts his information is not presented as secondary information. In early August 1945, two atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These two bombs quickly yielded the surrender of Japan and the end of the American involvement in World War II. By 1946, the two bombs caused the death of perhaps as many as 240,000 Japanese citizens. The popular view that dominated the 1950s and 60s, presented by President Truman and Secretary of War Henry Stimson, was that the at the dropping of the atomic bombs was a solely military action that avoided the loss of as many as a million lives in the upcoming American invasion of the island of Kyushu. In the 1960s a second idea developed, put forth by a collaboration of historians, that claimed the dropping of the bomb was a diplomatic maneuver aimed at gaining the upper hand in relations with Russia. Twenty years after the bombing, Feis, with the advantage of historical hindsight and the advantage of new evidence, developed a third view, free from obscuring bias. First, he stated that the dropping of the bomb was born out of a number of military, domestic, and diplomatic pressures and concerns. Secondly, many potentially alternatives to dropping the bombs were not explored by Truman and other men in power. Lastly, becaus...

Without the Economic Assistance of the U.S., Great Britain would of Essay

Without the Economic Assistance of the U.S., Great Britain would of Industrially Collapsed during World War II - Essay Example It also depicted some interesting facts about the Allied Victory and the different phases that Britain and America experienced. It was by the end of this very devastating war that America emerged as a new, popular and powerful nation in the world. Often the World War II is referred to as the â€Å"Good War† representing that in the war the good forces triumphed over the evil. Since every war has its aftermaths especially when it’s a widespread conflict and is quite destructive as was the World War II. The role of United States during the outbreak of World War II in 1939 had been quite neutral. However, when the Germany victories began to rise in Europe it was then that president Roosevelt considered being the ally of Britain and started seeking ways through which they can aid Britain while not indulging themselves in the war. Under its Neutrality Act initially by which only some cash and carry purchases were made by the belligerents, in the mid of 1940s it was declared by president Roosevelt to send US weapons to Britain in surplus amounts (Hickman n.d.).1. The support provided to Britain was increased in view of the devastating setbacks in the war when the Netherlands, Norway, Belgium, Luxemburg and France fell to Nazis. Although America had taken a stance on providing a split two-to-one favor and to remain out of the war at every cost even at the stake of Britain’s loss. However by the end of 1940 in November, America decided to aid Britain and to take the risk of a war (Cole 1983)2. This was even declared by the candidates running for the Presidential elections in America 1940 just three days before the elections that: â€Å"Our policy is to give all possible material aid to the nations which still resist aggression across the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans† (Roosevelt) and â€Å"All of us – Republicans, Democrats and Independents – believe in giving aid to the heroic British people. We must make available to them the products of our industry† (Willkie). Thus, showing America’s utmost interest in providing aid to Britain (Churchill 1949)3 By March, 1941 America had maintained its stance of staying away from war and kept its isolationist sentiment, while Britain kept on fighting the war alone. The effects of war on the financial standing of Britain were apparent, its financial assets were ending, the Commonwealth assets from overseas were also dried up, and it had no aid coming from anyplace. At that time it was only the Cash and Carry option provided by America that was available to Britain for buying the war supplies and under this it was using American destroyers to protect the shipments. It was quite evident from the conditions that Britain was reaching the stage of Bankruptcy. This soon led to the Lend-Lease Act of March, 1941 that made America an ally for Britain. Under this Act, Britain was given the privilege to buy the war good without having to pay America upfront for the go ods. Hence, Britain was given over $1 billion as aid at the end of the year believing it to be sufficient amount to keep Britain standing during the war time. It has been stated in the UK’s Guardian Unlimited that, under the American Lend-Lease Act, it transferred nearly $48 billion worth of war good to different nations during the period March 1941 to September 1945, out of which the aid send to Britain amounted to nearly $21 billion which nearly equaled to UKs entire years gross national product. The major good under the Lend-Lease included